2015 年 12 月 12 日，第 21 届联合国气候变化大会通过了《巴黎协定》。此举正式启动了 2020 年后全球温室气体减排进程，从而打破了联合国气候变化谈判自 2009 年以来陷入的法律僵局。虽然该协定将发展中国家纳入温室气体的强制减排中，但仍坚持共同但有区别的责任原则，并确立了国家自主贡献减排的法律模式，创建了包括可持续发展机制在内的应对气候变化的新机制。然而，《巴黎协定》在实体和形式方面仍存在诸多不完善和不确定之处，这需要国际社会进一步加强合作与努力。对中国而言，在国际上，仍需发挥其大国作用，积极筹划相关制度安排。在国内，应考虑后者与“十三五”规划的衔接，探讨新能源和可再生能源领域发展中的制度选择，实现地区气候治理模式的多元化。

      关键词：巴黎协定 气候变化 气候机制 中国气候变化制度选择

Paris Agreement: New Climate Institutional Arrangement, uncertainty, andChina’s Choices

Abstract: The 21st United Nations Climate Change Conference adopted the Paris Agreement on December 12, 2015. The agreement officially launches the post-2020 global greenhouse gas emissions process, and breaks the deadlock in the climate change negotiations since 2009. Although the agreement incorporates the developing countries into the compulsory emission reduction, it still adheres to the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, established the legal status of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), and creates some new institutions including the sustainable development institution. However, the Paris Agreement has some imperfects and uncertainties in the substantive and formal aspects, which requires the international society to further strengthen cooperation and efforts. For China, it should play its role of big power, actively working on relevant institutional arrangements, consider the connection between the agreement and the 13th Five-Year Plan, make institutional choices in new energy and renewable energy, and realize the diversified models in local climate governance.

Key words: the Paris Agreement; climate change; climate institution

吕江：《<巴黎协定>：新的气候制度安排、不确定性及中国选择》，载《国际观察》（CSSCI）2016年第3期，第92-104页。

_巴黎协定_新的制度安排_不确定性及中国选择_吕江.pdf