气候变化立法的制度变迁在国际上是由科学议题转向政治问题，再由政治问题转向制度安排；而在中国，则是由环境问题转向发展议题，再由发展议题转向制度安排。毫无疑问，二者在制度变迁方面存在着不同。对此，历史制度主义认为，这种不同的存在是客观的、合理的，是历史情境和制度沿袭的必然结果。基于此，未来的气候变化立法应尊重这种差异性，在防止立法中出现不良路径依赖的同时，还应加强对气候变化立法关键节点的掌控。

  关键词：气候变化；气候变化法；制度变迁

institutional change history of climate change law: world and China

Jiang LYU

Abstract: Internationally, institutional change of climate change legislation is from the scientific issues to political issues, and then from political to institutional arrangement. Whereas inChina, it is from environmental issues to development issues, and then from development issues to institutional planning. Both of them are different paths in terms of institutional change. From the perspective of historical institutionalism, the existence of the different paths is objective, reasonable, and is the result of historical context and institutional legacy. Therefore, in the future, climate change legislation should respect the difference, prevent adverse path dependence, and strengthen the control for the critical junctures.

Key words: climate change; climate change law; institutional change

吕江：《气候变化立法的制度变迁史：世界与中国》，载《江苏大学学报》（哲社版）2014年第4期，第41-49页。

气候变化立法的制度变迁史_世界与中国_吕江.pdf